Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Radheyshyam Bisani Vs ITO (ITAT Surat)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Radheyshyam Bisani Vs ITO (ITAT Surat) ITAT Surat held that assessee is not required to get his books of accounts audited under section 44AB of the Income Tax Act as capital gain, short term or long term, doesn’t form part of turnover. Accordingly, penalty under section 271B not leviable. Facts- The assessee is an individual and while return of income has income from salary, house property and capital gain. The Assessing Officer while passing the assessment order, accepted the return of income. However, the Assessing Officer initiated penalty under Section 271B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (i...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930