Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Hindalco Industries Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Hindalco Industries Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Kolkata) CESTAT Kolkata held that demanding duty on the short payment, ignoring the excess payment is bad in law. Accordingly, demand of differential duty unsustainable as the entire exercise is revenue neutral. Facts- During the period April 2009 to March 2010, the Hirakud Unit cleared aluminium ingots and coils to the said sister units upon payment of excise duty, on the basis of 110% of the estimated cost of production (as per the previous year’s CAS-4 statements adjusted for inflation and forecast of price increase in ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930