Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Hindalco Industries Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Hindalco Industries Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Kolkata)

CESTAT Kolkata held that demanding duty on the short payment, ignoring the excess payment is bad in law. Accordingly, demand of differential duty unsustainable as the entire exercise is revenue neutral.

Facts- During the period April 2009 to March 2010, the Hirakud Unit cleared aluminium ingots and coils to the said sister units upon payment of excise duty, on the basis of 110%

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31