This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Demand of extended period not sustainable If no suppression of facts
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- C.C.E.-Ahmedabad Vs Quippo Energy Pvt Limited (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Ahmedabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
C.C.E.-Ahmedabad Vs Quippo Energy Pvt Limited (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
CESTAT held that since there is no suppression of fact, demand of extended period is not sustainable. The penalty imposed in the impugned order was held to be not warranted accordingly, the same was set aside.
FULL TEXT OF THE CESTAT AHMEDABAD ORDER
In this revenue’s appeal, revenue seeks to impose equal of penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 as against the penalty of Rs.1 lakh was imposed by the adjudicating authority.
2. Shri Tara Prakash, learned Deputy Commissioner (AR) appearing on b...
