Demand of extended period not sustainable If no suppression of facts

C.C.E.-Ahmedabad Vs Quippo Energy Pvt Limited (CESTAT Ahmedabad) CESTAT held that since there is no suppression of fact, demand of extended period is not sustainable. The penalty imposed in the impugned order was held to be not warranted accordingly, the same was set aside. FULL TEXT OF THE CESTAT AHMEDABAD ORDER In this revenue’s appeal, revenue seeks to impose equal of penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 as against the penalty of Rs.1 lakh was imposed by the adjudicating authority. 2. Shri Tara Prakash, learned Deputy Commissioner (AR) appearing on behalf of the reve...