When demand itself is not sustainable, penalty cannot be imposed
Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Excise Duty

When demand itself is not sustainable, penalty cannot be imposed

Case Law Details

Case Name
Commissioner of Central Excise Vs Ultra Tech Cement Limited (CESTAT Kolkata)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement
Commissioner of Central Excise Vs Ultra Tech Cement Limited (CESTAT Kolkata) Respondent submits that when the demand itself is not sustainable, the question of imposing penalty does not arise. He further submits that the impugned order has erroneously invoked the extended period of limitation under Section 11A(1) of the Act on the ground of willful suppression and imposed penalty under Rule 15(2) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. A detailed order has been passed by this Bench of the Tribunal in the case of assessee’s appeal being Excise Appeal NO.70 of 2010 vide Final Order No.75181/2023 dat...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *