Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise Vs Ultra Tech Cement Limited (CESTAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Commissioner of Central Excise Vs Ultra Tech Cement Limited (CESTAT Kolkata) Respondent submits that when the demand itself is not sustainable, the question of imposing penalty does not arise. He further submits that the impugned order has erroneously invoked the extended period of limitation under Section 11A(1) of the Act on the ground of willful suppression and imposed penalty under Rule 15(2) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. A detailed order has been passed by this Bench of the Tribunal in the case of assessee’s appeal being Excise Appeal NO.70 of 2010 vide Final Order No.75181/2023 dat...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930