Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sequoia Capital India Advisors Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sequoia Capital India Advisors Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai) CESTAT Mumbai held that rejection of refund claim under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 solely on the basis of the ground that there is no nexus between the input service and the output service exported is untenable in law. Facts- The issue involved herein is about denial of refund of accumulated/unutilized Cenvat Credit of Service tax under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 r/w Notification No.27/2012 -CE (NT) dated 18.6.2012. Whether the authorities below have rightly rejected the refu...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031