This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
CIT(A) bound to consider stay petitions & decide the same by speaking order
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- APR Jewellers Private Limited Vs CIT (Telangana High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All High Courts, Telangana High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
APR Jewellers Private Limited Vs CIT (Telangana High Court)
Power to consider prayer for stay is incidental and ancillary to the power to hear appeals and CIT Appeals is bound to hear and decide stay petitions filed by appellant after independent application of mind .
Needless to say, 1st respondent as the appellate authority exercises quasi-judicial powers. Power to consider prayer for stay is incidental and ancillary to the power to hear appeals. As a quasi-judicial authority, Commissioner (Appeals) is not bound by the administrative circulars issued by CBDT. He has to apply his own indepe...
Author Info
