Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : I-Tech Plast India Pvt. Ltd. Vs State Of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court)
Appeal Number : R/Special Civil Application No. 3653 Of 2021
Date of Judgement/Order : 07/04/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

I-Tech Plast India Pvt. Ltd. Vs State Of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court)

In so far as the erroneous grant of refund and return of such refund amount together with interest by the writ-applicant is concerned, the same is undisputed. That being the case, the first part of the transaction is nullified inasmuch as the amount erroneously refunded has already been repaid by the writ-applicant along with interest. However, once both these transactions are taken out from the equation, what survives is the reduction of the ITC originally effected from the electronic credit ledger of the writ-applicant. The respondent authorities are of the view that the writ-applicant is not entitled to such a refund of the ITC at all. According to Mr.Sharma, the learned AGP, such a refund is not permissible under sub-rule (10) of rule 96 of the CGST Rules. However, in the present case, refund as contemplated under sub-rule (10) of rule 96 of the CGST Rules is not at all an issue. Here, the simple issue is one of restoration of the ITC, which was erroneously refunded and subsequently recovered. If the authorities have accepted that there was an error and resultantly, accepted repayment of the erroneous refund, as a corollary, the credit of the ITC must be restored. It cannot be that for the purpose of repayment, there was an error, and for the purpose of restoration of the ITC, there was no error. There is no question of any refund of the ITC at all. The question is one of restoration of the ITC in the electronic credit ledger and not a refund thereof. Hence, any reference to sub-rule (10) of rule 96 of the CGST Rules is completely misconceived and not tenable.

In such circumstances, We direct the respondent authorities to re-credit/restore the ITC to the tune of 1,39,49,810/- in the electronic tax ledger of the writ-applicant.

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF GUJARAT HIGH COURT

1. By this writ-application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ-applicant has prayed for the following reliefs:

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031