Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Gulmuhar Silk Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P.(C) 5787/2022 & CM APPL.17297/2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 07/04/2022
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Gulmuhar Silk Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (Delhi High Court)

Though it is the petitioner’s case that the impugned order is erroneous on facts, yet this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner would have ample opportunity during the course of proceedings before different statutory forums to show that the finding of fact arrived at was erroneous. Moreover, at this stage, no assessment order has been passed and it has only been observed that it is a fit case for issuance of notice under Section 148 of the Act. In fact, the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax and Ors. Vs. Chhabil Das Agarwal, (2014) 1 SCC 603 has held that as the Income Tax Act, 1961 provides complete machinery for assessment/ reassessment of tax, assessee is not permitted to abandon that machinery and invoke jurisdiction of High Court under Article 226. Consequently, the present case does not fall under the exceptional grounds on which a writ petition is maintainable at the interim stage in tax matters. [See: Ghanashyam Mishra And Sons Private Limited Vs. Edelweiss Assetre Construction Company Limited, (2021) 9 SCC 657 and M/S Radha Krishan Industries vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors, (2021) 6 SCC 771].

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF DELHI HIGH COURT

1. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 28th March, 2022 passed by Respondent under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [‘the Act’] for the assessment year 2018-19, Show Cause Notice dated 7th March, 2022 issued under Section 148A(b) of the Act as well as notice dated 28th March, 2022 purportedly issued under Section 148 of the Act.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the impugned order dated 28th March, 2022 is a non-speaking order which does not deal with the contentions raised by the Petitioner in reply to the impugned Show Cause Notice dated 7th March, 2022. In support of his submission, he relies upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in Kranti Associates Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Mashook Ahmed Khan and Ors, SLP (C) No.20428/2007.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031