Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In re Saisanket Enterprises (GST AAR Madhya Pradesh)
Appeal Number : Order No. 20/2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 10/12/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

In re Saisanket Enterprises (GST AAR Madhya Pradesh)

The judicial citations relied upon by the applicant have been duly perused and considered by us. However, we find that as per the proviso to Section 98(2) of CGST Act, the Authority shall not admit the application where the question raised in the application is already pending or decided in any proceedings in the case of an applicant. Hence, we find that the application is liable to be rejected and the judicial citation relied upon by the applicant has no relevance.

In view of above, The Application filed by the Applicant under Advance Ruling under CGST Act, 2017 is hereby rejected as per the provision of Section 98(2) of CGST Act, 2017.

Also Read AAAR: Application not maintainable if question raised is already pending or decided: AAAR

FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF THE AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE RULING, MADHYA PRADESH

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031