Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ekambaram Sukumaran Vs ITO (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P. No.10433 of 2021 & WMP Nos.11029 & 11032 of 2021
Date of Judgement/Order : 27/04/2021
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Ekambaram Sukumaran Vs ITO (Madras High Court)

The Honourable High Court has set aside the impugned assessment order for de-novo completion, holding it to be in breach of the principle of natural justice as the order was made prior to the elapse of time granted to respond to show cause notice (SCN), the impugned order of assessment has come to be passed on the same day.

The impugned order is thus set aside. The petitioner will file its response to show cause notice within a period of two weeks from today and the assessment shall be completed de novo within a period of six (6) weeks from today, after hearing the petitioner.

HC set aside Assessment order passed prior to elapse of time granted to respond to SCN

FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER /JUDGEMENT

Mr.ANR.Jayaprathap, learned Junior Standing Counsel, who accepts notice for the respondents, has been served with the copy of the Writ Petition and its annexures and hence is aware of the issue raised as well as the dates and sequence of events that have transpired in this matter. Thus, by consent of both sides, this Writ Petition is disposed finally even at the stage of admission.

2. The challenge is to order of assessment dated 23.03.2021 relating to assessment year 2018-19 passed in terms of the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘Act’). The short point agitated is the gross violation of principles of natural justice.

3. Pre-assessment notice dated 19.03.2021 was issued calling upon the petitioner to show cause why assessment should not be completed in line with the draft assessment order under the faceless assessment scheme. In conclusion, the petitioner was called upon to submit his response by 23:59 hours of 23.03.2021. However, even prior to the elapse of time granted, the impugned order of assessment has come to be passed on the same day, i.e., 23.03.2021, one assumes during the working hours. Hence, there is a violation of principles of natural justice writ large of the document.

4. One need hardly refer to the decision of the learned single Judge of this Court in the case of S.Velupalandar V. Deputy Commercial Tax Officer (83 ITR 683), wherein this Court has stated that it was incumbent upon an Officer to wait till the end of the working day when the matter had been posted to finalize proceedings. This is an even better case than in the matter of Velupalandar (supra), since the Assessing Officer had himself granted time till 23:59 hours on 23.03.2021.

5. The impugned order is thus set aside. The petitioner will file its response to show cause notice dated 19.03.2021 within a period of two weeks from today and the assessment shall be completed de novo within a period of six (6) weeks from today, after hearing the petitioner.

6. This Writ Petition is disposed in the aforesaid terms. No costs. Connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
February 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728