Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sumati Dayal Vs. CIT (Supreme Court)
Appeal Number : C.A. No.-001344-001345/1977
Date of Judgement/Order : 28/03/1995
Related Assessment Year : 1971-72 & 1972-73
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Sumati Dayal Vs. CIT (Supreme Court)

Explore the Supreme Court judgment in the case of Sumati Dayal vs. CIT (Commissioner of Income Tax) and understand whether the apparent can be considered as real. The judgment emphasizes the application of the test of human probabilities and surrounding circumstances in taxation matters. Learn about the key findings of the court, the relevance of the case in assessing income, and the caution against the indiscriminate application of the judgment in various scenarios.

Whether the apparent can be considered as real? As laid down by this Court, apparent must be considered real until it is shown that there are reasons to believe that the apparent is not the real and that the taxing authorities arc entitled to look into the surrounding circumstances to find out the reality and the matter has to be considered by applying the test of human probabilities.

Test of human probabilities and surrounding circumstances not to be applied in every case without doing groundwork on the file of the AO. In the below referred case the test of human probabilities and surrounding circumstances was applied by AO and confirmed by the Hon’ble SC where the case of the assessee was apparent but not real. This test was applied with utmost care and taking sworn statement of the Assessee. Without Groundwork on the file test cannot be applied.

“Supreme Court of India

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

I am S.K.Jain , Tax Consultant cum Advocate practising in Income Tax , GST , Company Matters . The name of the concern is S.K. Jain and Co. and I am prop. of this concern . I am in practice for the last 30 years . Professionals and non professional can feel free to contact me on mail . My mail ID is View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Draft Submission- No Section 271(1)(c) penalty when no specific limb been mentioned Sample Grounds for ITAT Appeal: Condonation of Delay under Sec. 249(3) Post CIT(A)’s Rejection Draft Format of letter for filing objection to Section 148 Income Tax notice Mere cash deposited with bank is not a prima facie belief for escapement of Income Cash withdrawn and redeposit is not income from Undisclosed Sources View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031