Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Machinery part replacement expense not resulting in production capacity increase is revenue expense

Case Law Details

Case Name
Jaya Hind Industries Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2010-11
Advertisement Jaya Hind Industries Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune) which is used in the robotic arms forming part of high pressure die casting machines can be allowed as revenue expenditure. The factual submissions made on behalf of the appellant are that the expenditure was incurred on replacement of Gripper which is part of robotic arms forming part of high pressure die casting machines. There is no increase of productivity or capacity on account of incurring this expenditure. It is also submitted that this part namely Gripper cannot be machine itself i.e. it cannot perform any function indep...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *