This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
No section 271B Penalty for Not furnishing Audit Report before ITR Filing
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Vrinda Sales P. Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2010-11
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Kolkata
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Vrinda Sales P. Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
The issue under consideration is whether CIT(A) is correct in levying penalty under Section 271B for not auditing books of accounts/ furnishing reports of the audit of books of accounts on the due date of filing Income Tax Return (ITR)?
ITAT states that, in the instant case, they find that the assessee was required to get his books of accounts audited on or before the due date of filing of the return of income. There was no relaxation in getting the books of account audited by a Chartered Accountant and relaxation was given only for furnishing the Tax Au...
