Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : CIT Vs Information Architects (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 2207 of 2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 09/02/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

CIT Vs Information Architects (Bombay High Court)

The amounts paid by the assessee to its employees towards overseas maintenance allowance. These amounts were paid towards expenses at the rate of IEP 50 per day per employee. Held that these amounts constitute only reimbursement for the expenses incurred by the employees at a particular amount per day and would not form part of the salary in the hands of the recipients. Hence the question of applying sub-clause (iii) of clause (a) of section 40 would not arise. 

FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER /JUDGEMENT

These appeals by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 have raised similar questions of law. For convenience of reference, it would be appropriate to set out the questions of law which have been formulated in one of the two appeals which are as follows:

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031