This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Expression allowed to be sold cannot be interpreted as the compulsory condition that goods must be actually sold
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Nestle India Limited (Supreme Court of India)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- Supreme Court of India
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Brief of the case:
The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Nestle India Ltd. held that partial exemption available under exemption notifications does not require assessee to clear the goods by way of sale only because in the notification expression “allowed to be sold” has been used which implies that goods cleared should only be those which are allowed to be sold in India as per EXIM policy.
Therefore, in the present case assessee was entitled to claim benefit under the notification even if the goods not actually sold and only captively consumed.
Facts of the cas...






