Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sri Arthur Bernard Sebastine Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sri Arthur Bernard Sebastine Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) A very interesting judgement on income tax intimations u/s 143(1) of the Income Tax Act Facts of the Case: Assessee received his income from professional fees for Rs.15 lacs and savings bank interest income of Rs.14,228. Assessee filed his Itr taking benefit of section 44AD declaring presumptive taxation of 8% of the gross receipts. Relevant Extract Of Section 44AD: Sec. 44AD(6) provides that the provisions of section 44AD, shall not apply to— (i) a person carrying on profession as referred to in sub-section (1) of section 44AA; ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930