Case Law Details
Case Name : Sudip Rungta Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-2012
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Kolkata
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sudip Rungta Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata)
Clause (h) of Rule 2A specifically provides that ‘salary’ includes dearness allowance, if the terms of employment so provede, but excludes all other allowances and perquisites. Accordingly, the performance bonus received by the appellant did not form part of ‘salary’ for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 10(13A) of the Act. We note that the decision of the Hon’ble Kerala High Court in the case of CIT Vs B. Ghosal (125 ITR 444) is on identical facts wherein on exact same set of facts the Court had held that ‘performance bonus’ does not for...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

