This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Reassessment invalid if section 148 notice not served within stipulated period
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- B. M. Land Developers & Builders Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2007-08
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Hyderabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
B. M. Land Developers & Builders Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
In the case before us, the AO has issued notice u/s.148 of the Act on 26-03-2014. Therefore, it is within the period of six years from the end of relevant assessment year. However, it is clear that assessee has not been served notice u/s. 148 of the Act and even the notice by affixture was also served on 04-04-2014. But as rightly pointed out by the Ld.Counsel for the assessee, there is no report of the AO, which contains the names and addresses of the witnesses, who have identified the property. Further, it is also ...
