Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M/s. UR Options Vs Commissioner of G.S.T. & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)
Appeal Number : Service Tax Appeal No. 41040 of 2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 09/08/2019
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

M/s. UR Options Vs Commissioner of G.S.T. & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)

CESTAT Chennai has allowed refund of excess amount paid by mistake as pre-deposit by the assessee. It observed that when the legislature made it clear what is to be collected as pre-deposit, in the absence of any finding about non-satisfaction of conditions as to pre-deposit, the department cannot retain such excess amount remitted by mistake. The Tribunal observed that if one goes strictly by the requirements under Section 35FF of Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Circular No. 984/8/2014-CX, liability of assessee remains at 7.5%/10% and not a penny more.

FULL TEXT OF THE CESTAT JUDGEMENT

This appeal is filed by the appellant wherein it has assailed the findings of the First Appellate Authority who has rejected its refund claim of the pre-deposit paid in excess, by mistake, of the mandatory requirement.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031