Case Law Details
M/s. UR Options Vs Commissioner of G.S.T. & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)
CESTAT Chennai has allowed refund of excess amount paid by mistake as pre-deposit by the assessee. It observed that when the legislature made it clear what is to be collected as pre-deposit, in the absence of any finding about non-satisfaction of conditions as to pre-deposit, the department cannot retain such excess amount remitted by mistake. The Tribunal observed that if one goes strictly by the requirements under Section 35FF of Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Circular No. 984/8/2014-CX, liability of assessee remains at 7.5%/10% and not a penny more.
FULL TEXT OF THE CESTAT JUDGEMENT
This appeal is filed by the appellant wherein it has assailed the findings of the First Appellate Authority who has rejected its refund claim of the pre-deposit paid in excess, by mistake, of the mandatory requirement.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.