Case Law Details
Case Name : CIT Vs M/s Kuber Mutual Benefit Ltd. (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 96/2006
Date of Judgement/Order : 05/02/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Delhi High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Issue before Court:
Whether ITAT was right in not treating the processing or finance charges as interest income under the definition provided under section 2 of Interest Tax Act.
Brief facts:
- Assessee was carrying on financial business which included accepting deposits as a mutual benefit fund company. It also used to lend money and, for that purpose, charged from its borrowers certain amounts under different heads which included “financing charges”.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.