Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : CIT Vs M/s Kuber Mutual Benefit Ltd. (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 96/2006
Date of Judgement/Order : 05/02/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Issue before Court:

Whether ITAT was right in not treating the processing or finance charges as interest income under the definition provided under section 2 of Interest Tax Act.

Brief facts:

  • Assessee was carrying on financial business which included accepting deposits as a mutual benefit fund company. It also used to lend money and, for that purpose, charged from its borrowers certain amounts under different heads which included “financing charges”.
  • Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031