Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M/s. Landmark Lifestyle Vs. Union Of India & Ors. (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : WP(C) No. 6055/2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 27.05.2019
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

M/s. Landmark Lifestyle Vs. Union Of India & Ors. (Delhi High Court)

Delhi High Court has granted stay from recovery of interest demanded on gross GST liability till next hearing to be held in 30th Sept 2019 – Advocate J K Mittal represented the petitioner.

1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Mr. Mittal points out that the calculation of the interest payable for delayed payment of GST as determined by the Respondent is erroneous. According to him, interest has been calculated even on the amount constituting the input tax credit which is in fact to be adjusted against the tax liability. He states that on the actual tax liability, interest has been paid by the Petitioner. He further states that against the total tax liability of Rs.3.31 crores the interest liability works out to 8.19 crores which makes it unreasonable and erroneous.

3. Notice. Mr. Harpreet Singh, Advocate accepts notice for the Respondents.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

2 Comments

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031