Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Granite Gate Properties (P.) Ltd. Vs PCIT (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : IT Appeal No. 398 & 399 of 2017
Date of Judgement/Order : 19/12/2018
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Granite Gate Properties (P.) Ltd. Vs PCIT (Delhi High Court)

FACTS –

Assessee is a company engaged in real-estate development and started construction of 2 housing projects Lotus Boulevard and Lotus Panache in AY 2010-11 and 2011-12. Assessee was following Percentage of Completion Method (PoC) of accounting. Assessee didn’t recognized revenue of Lotus Boulevard and Lotus Panache till construction and development had crossed threshold of 30%.

Threshold of 30% of Lotus Boulevard and Lotus Panache were crossed during AY 2010-11 and 2011-12 and accordingly proportionate cost and revenue was booked in Profit & loss account. Indirect expenses of selling, administrative and other expenses, commission and finance were treated and shown in the return of AY 2010-11 and 2011-12.

Return for AY 2010-11 and 2011-12 were taken up for scrutiny assessment. Assessee submitted that as per PoC method they rightly didn’t accounted for revenue in respect of Lotus Boulevard for AY 2010-11 and Lotus Panache for AY 2011-12 since the project had not crossed threshold of 30%.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031