Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mr. Jackie Shroff Vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA NO.4838/MUM/2016
Date of Judgement/Order : 31/12/2018
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Advocate Akhilesh Kumar Sah

Mr. Jackie Shroff Vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)

When The Moneys Are Advanced As Measure Of Commercial Expediency Such Advances Are In The Nature Of Business Advances And The Write Off  Of Such Advances By The Assessee Should Be Allowed As Deduction Under Section 37(1) Or Under Section 28 Of The Income Tax Act As Business Loss: Jackie Shroff Recent Case

In Jackie Shroff vs. ACIT [ITA No. 4838/MUM/2016 (A.Y: 2009-10), Decided On 31.12.2018], briefly, the assessee advanced money to M/s. Quest Films which was the proprietary concern of Mrs. Ayesha Shroff being the wife of the assessee. The amounts advanced upto 31.03.2008 stood at Rs. 9,01,68,594/- out of these advances during the current Assessment Year M/s. Quest Films returned an amount of 1,09,25,851/-, thereby the total advances made by the assessee to M/s. Quest Films stood at 7,92,42,743/- by the end of the current Assessment Year. Similarly, assessee advanced 2,31,80,631/- upto 3 .03 2008 to his wife Mrs. Ayesha Shroff and during the current Assessment Year an amount of 1,10,36,405/- was advanced totaling to 3,42,17,236/- to Mrs. Ayesha Shroff. The total advances made by the assessee upto the end of the current Assessment Year stood at Rs. 11,34,59,979/-.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031