Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : National Building Construction Corporation Ltd. Vs CST(CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ST/53500/2014-CU (DB)/DEL
Date of Judgement/Order : 23/07/2018
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

National Building Construction Corporation Ltd. Vs CST (CESTAT Delhi)

Services of construction of women hostel for and on behalf of Ministry of Women and Child Development (WCD), Government of India and construction of Civil Services Offices Institute are not commercial in nature. In furtherance of the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner, Kerala vs. L & T Ltd. 2015 (39) STR 913 (SC), wherein it was held:-

“that a works contract is a separate species of contract distinct from contracts for services simpliciter recognized by the world of commerce and law as such, and has to be taxed separately as such.” And further observed in para “31. In the aforesaid judgment, it was held that the levy of service tax in Section 65(105)(g), (zzd), (zzh), (zzq) and (zzzh) is good enough to tax indivisible composite works contracts.”, and in para held that “24. A close look at the Finance Act, 1994 would show that the five taxable services referred to in the charging Section 65(105) would refer only to service contracts simpliciter and not to composite works contracts. This is clear from the very language of Section 65(105) which defines “taxable service” as “any service provided”. Therefore, now it is settled that section 65 (105)(zzq) read with section 65(25b) of the Finance Act do not cover composite contract, it only covers contracts for services simpliciter, whereas, in the present case, it is undisputed facts that all contracts are composite contracts

 Since the demand under commercial or industrial construction for a period upto 30th June, 2012 has been dropped and the period for both the appeals is prior the said date and that the Department has not filed an appeal challenging those findings by virtue whereof the demand in appeal No.52331 had already been dropped. The benefit thereof is extended in favour of the appellant qua appeal No. 53500/2014 as well. The order under challenge confirming the levy qua this service is therefore set aside.

FULL TEXT OF THE CESTAT JUDGMENT

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031