Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M/s. Kediya Ceramics (NCLT Ahemdabad)
Appeal Number : CA(CAA) No. 95/NCLT/AHM/2017
Date of Judgement/Order : 22/09/2017
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : NCLT
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Ahemdabad Bench of National Company Law Tribunal (“NCLT”), in a recent case Kediya Ceramics [IA No. 254/NCLT/AHM/2017 in CA(CAA) No. 95/NCLT/AHM/2017] vide order dated 22.09.2017 has held that a partnership firm cannot participate in amalgamation proceedings under section 230-232 of the Companies Act, 2013 (“Act”). The brief facts of the said case are as follows:

Kediya Ceramics, a registered partnership firm entered into amalgamation proceedings as a transferor company. During the course of proceedings, a question arose for consideration of NCLT:

“Whether a registered partnership firm, being a body corporate, can be treated as a company for the purpose of section 230-232 of the Companies Act, 2013?” 

Kediya Ceramics placed reliance on definition of body corporate or corporation given under section 2(11) of the Act. As per the said provision, an entity which is a registered co-operative society or a other body corporates notified by Central Government is not a body corporate. The Central Government has not notified anything in this regard yet; section 2(95) of the Act which provides for reference of meaning of words not defined under Act to the words or expressions defined under SEBI Act, 1992, Securities Contract (Regulation) Act, 1992 and Depositories Act, 1996 and accordingly relied on definition of “company” given under the said laws as a company means any body corporate and includes a firm or other association of individuals; section 366 ( Part I of Chapter XXI) of the Act (companies authorized to registered under the Act) according to which company for the purposes of Part I includes partnership firms, cooperative societies, society or any other business entity; explanation (b) to section 375(4) of the Act – wherein the expression “unregistered company” includes any partnership firm consisting of more than 7 members; and explanation to section 234(2) of the Act wherein the expression “foreign company” means any company or body corporate incorporated outside India whether having a place of business in India or not.

NCLT observed that applicant cannot rely of definition of company given under other laws when the same has been specifically defined under section 2(20) of the Act. A company has been defined under the Act as:

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio


My Published Posts

Effect of striking off on companies View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

7 Comments

  1. dhiraj says:

    if a partnership firm merge with a private limited company then whether the incentive getting by the firm situated in special economic zone like north east will continue of post merge.

  2. Abishek Giya says:

    I really appreciate the efforts behind writing this article.
    I have a question after going through the article, As takeover and M&A are different from view point of companies but when we speak with regard to Partnership firm, is it possible that a Company can takeover a partnership firm ? OR Even that is restricted as specified above in the article.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031