Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Failure to specify exact charge in section 274 notice makes it invalid

Case Law Details

Case Name
Jehangir HC Jehangir Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2006-07
Advertisement 1. Briefly stated the assessee, being resident individual engaged in development of land by construction of residential/ commercial premises, was assessed for impugned AY u/s 143(3) at Rs. 28,20,17,740/- after certain adjustments/ dis allowances as against returned income of Rs. 18,95,66,240/-. One of the dis allowances pertained to dis allowances u/s. 40(a)(ia) amounting to Rs. 1,81,29,209 for non- deduction of tax at source on certain contractual payments. Another adjustment was related with assessee’s claim towards set-off of unabsorbed brought forward business losses fo...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 18,808

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

1 Comment
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *