Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs M/s. Bakeri Construction Pvt Ltd (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 3083/Ahd/2013 & CO No.56/Ahd/2014
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/02/2017
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Contention of the revenue

1. The CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in considering the share of profit of Rs.47.48 crores as exempt u/s 10(2A) in the hands of the assessee despite the fact that the total income of the said firm namely M/s Parashar was Rs.Nil after claiming deduction u/s 80IB.

2. The CIT(A) has not appreciated the fact that the Circular No.636 dated 03.1992 was meant to prevent occurrence to double taxation. In this case, the income is not taxable in the hands of the firm and hence there is no question of double taxation while taxing the same in the hands of the partner (assessee).

Held by ITAT

CBDT itself has accepted the proposition that the share income from the firm received by the partners is exempt u/s 10(2A) of the Act and under no circumstances can be taxed in the hands of the partners. In view thereof, the order of the CIT(A) is upheld and the appeal of the Revenue is accordingly dismissed.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031