Case Law Details
With regard to the first issue the AO was under the wrong impression in treating the reimbursement of ‘scheme expenses’ as “provision for expenses” whereas the fact remains that the expenses were crystallized and it was paid immediately after the end of the financial year and similar expenses were allowed as eligible for deduction in the subsequent year. With regard to applicability of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act also, the learned CIT(A) gave cogent reasons in holding that provisions relating to TDS are not applicable and on similar issue the matter was decided in favour of the assessee in respect of A.Y. 2007-08.
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, Mumbai
ITA No.5844/Mum/2010 – (Assessment Year: 2006-07)
D C I T Vs. M /s. Tata Asset Management Ltd
Date of Pronouncement: 20.06.2012
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
