Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh- I Vs M/s Lalit Steel and Agro Industries (Punjab & Haryana High Court)
Appeal Number : CEA No. 125 of 2010 (O&M)
Date of Judgement/Order : 05/07/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

On further appeal by the respondent-dealer who issued invoices, the Tribunal vide order dated 16.9.2009, reduced the penalty to 10% taking into account that 100% penalty had already been levied on the assessee who claimed Cenvat Credit wrongly.

100% penalty has already been levied on the assessee wrongly claiming the benefit of Cenvat Credit, the view taken by Tribunal in reducing penalty in the case of the respondent cannot be said to be perverse so as to hold that a substantial question of law arises.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH

 C.M. No. 16102-CII of 2010 and

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031