This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
ITAT deletes hypothetical, harassing & inconvenient decision
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Mrs.Mintu Sayermal Jain Vs Income Tax Officer (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2007-08
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Brief of the Case
Various additions have been made by AO without proper application of mind and has no distant connection with the material on record & third party transactions were added in the hands of the assessee without any basis or material and thus, the AO framed the assessment in a hypothetical way putting the assessee to enormous harassment and inconvenience. Similarly, the ld. CIT(A) confirmed the addition without looking into the merits and facts of the cases which are very clear and apparent from the records produced.
Facts of the Case
Facts in brief are that the assessee fil...




