Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M/s Jai Ganesh Processors Vs. CCE (High Court of Punjab and Haryana)
Appeal Number : C.E.A. No. 228 of 2010 (O&M)
Date of Judgement/Order : 11/03/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

M/s Jai Ganesh Processors Vs. CCE, C, Chandigarh (High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh) –  Even though the Hon’ble Supreme Court held that the assessee would not get benefit of exemption if duty had not been paid on inputs, the assessee held a bonafide view about interpretation of the notification. Thus, it may not be a case of deliberate evasion of duty. While the Tribunal rightly rejected the claim of the assessee that exemption was applicable, the setting aside of penalty cannot be held to be illegal. Levy of penalty is not automatic merely because an exemption was wrongly availed, even when plea of the assessee is found to be erroneous.

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

C.E.A. No. 228 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.03.2011

Commissioner of Central Excise Commissionerate . Vs. M/s Jai Ganesh Processors.

AND connected cases being CEA Nos.231, 233, 234, 236, 238, 242, 243, 246, 248, 249, 252, 259 to 261, 263, 264, 267, 269, 271, 276, 278, 281, 283 & 290 of 2010

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031