Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In re The Timken Company (AAR Delhi)
Appeal Number : A.A.R. No. 836 of 2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 23/07/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Advance Rulings
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

As the applicant does not have any physical presence in India in the form of an office or branch or a PE, the provisions of section 115JB are not applicable on the sale of shares of a listed company by the applicant, which has suffered securities transaction tax and accordingly, tax exempt under section 10(38)

Section 115JB is not designed to be applicable to the case of the applicant, a foreign company, who has no presence or PE in India.(Para 9.2)

As the applicant does not have any physical presence in India in the form of an office or branch or a PE, the provisions of section 115JB of the Act are not applicable on the sale of shares of a listed company Timken India Limited, by the applicant, which has suffered securities transaction tax and accordingly, tax exempt under section 10(38) of the Act.(Para 10)

BEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX), NEW DELHI

A.A.R. No. 836 of 2009

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031