This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Clandestine Removal Cannot Be Proved Solely as Power Consumption Was Higher
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Commissioner of Central Excise Vs Saravana Alloy Steel Private Limited (Karnataka High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Karnataka High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Commissioner of Central Excise Vs Saravana Alloy Steel Private Limited (Karnataka High Court)
The Karnataka High Court dismissed the Revenue’s appeal and upheld the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal’s (CESTAT) order relating to allegations of clandestine manufacture and removal of excisable goods by a steel manufacturer. The Revenue had challenged the Tribunal’s decision, which had set aside excise duty demands, penalties and related findings arising from three show cause notices issued for different periods. The dispute concerned allegations...





