Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Excise Duty

Clandestine Removal Cannot Be Proved Solely as Power Consumption Was Higher

Case Law Details

Case Name
Commissioner of Central Excise Vs Saravana Alloy Steel Private Limited (Karnataka High Court)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement Commissioner of Central Excise Vs Saravana Alloy Steel Private Limited (Karnataka High Court) The Karnataka High Court dismissed the Revenue’s appeal and upheld the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal’s (CESTAT) order relating to allegations of clandestine manufacture and removal of excisable goods by a steel manufacturer. The Revenue had challenged the Tribunal’s decision, which had set aside excise duty demands, penalties and related findings arising from three show cause notices issued for different periods. The dispute concerned allegations...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 18,775

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *