Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Viswanathan Padmanabhan Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Viswanathan Padmanabhan Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) U/s 54F Relief Allowed Despite Sale Deed After Two Years- ITAT Holds Flat Booking & Substantial Payment Satisfy the Law The Bangalore ITAT granted deduction under Section 54F to an assessee who had sold a property on 07.01.2015 and invested the capital gains in a flat booked with a builder, even though the registered sale deed for the new flat was executed after the expiry of two years from the date of transfer. The Tribunal held that substantial investment and acquisition of rights in the property within the prescribed period are more import...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Technical Glitch in Form 26A Filing Cannot Trigger Section 40(a)(ia) Disallowance: ITAT Bangalore Form 26AS Alone Cannot Decide Taxability of FD Interest: ITAT Bangalore Entire Bogus Purchases Not Taxable If Sales Accepted; Only Profit Taxable: ITAT Bangalore Bangalore ITAT Reaffirms that Transfer Pricing Adjustment Must Be Restricted Only to International Transactions with AEs Reassessment Quashed as New Allegations Exceeded Section 148A Proceedings: Karnataka HC View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031