This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Delay Excused, Ex-Parte Order Set Aside – ITAT Gives Fresh Hearing with Token Cost
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Srikanth Bollapally Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2020-21
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Bangalore
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Srikanth Bollapally Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Delay Excused, Ex-Parte Order Set Aside – ITAT Gives Fresh Hearing with Token Cost
In the case of Srikanth Bollapally, the Bangalore ITAT dealt with a delay of 208 days in filing appeal arising from an ex-parte order of CIT(A).
The assessee explained that:
He was unaware of the CIT(A) order,
Came to know of it only upon receipt of a penalty order u/s 270A, and
Filed appeal immediately thereafter.
The Tribunal accepted this explanation and held:
Delay was bona fide and not due to negligence or deliberate inaction.
A liberal appro...
Author Info
