Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Nagaraju Kesturkoppal Ramegowda Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Nagaraju Kesturkoppal Ramegowda Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) The assessee faced an ex-parte assessment under Section 144 where the AO treated entire bank deposits as unexplained income under Section 69A due to lack of response. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal on grounds of massive delay (1969 days) without examining merits. The ITAT condoned the delay considering financial hardship, business closure, and lack of awareness, emphasizing that substantial justice must prevail. It observed that even in ex-parte cases, the AO is duty-bound to make a fair and scientific assessment, and cannot arbitrarily ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Restores Section 80P Deduction Claim of Agricultural Credit Co-op Society Missing Safety Certificates Justified Section 12AB Registration Rejection: Bengaluru ITAT Absence of Irrevocability Clause Alone No Ground to Deny Section 12AB Registration: ITAT Mumbai Sections 234B & 234C Interest Excluded from Tax Effect for Appeal Limit: ITAT Mumbai Earlier Loan Repayment via Bank Not Taxable Under Section 68: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031