Case Law Details
Case Name : ITO Vs Arvind Ratanchand Jain (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Arvind Ratanchand Jain (ITAT Mumbai)
The Mumbai ITAT upheld the restriction of addition to 12.5% of alleged bogus purchases, rejecting the AO’s higher addition of 25%, and reaffirmed the settled principle that only profit element embedded in such purchases can be taxed.
The AO had treated purchases of ₹54.27 crore as non-genuine due to:
Suppliers having cancelled GST registrations,
Circular trading patterns,
Lack of proper transport and documentation,
Non-commensurate banking transactions.
Accordingly, AO made 25% addition (₹13.56 crore).
However, the CIT(A):
Noted that sales w...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

