Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bajaj Auto Limited Vs Commissioner of Uttarakhand State GST Uttarakhand & Ors. (Uttarakhand High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bajaj Auto Limited Vs Commissioner of Uttarakhand State GST Uttarakhand & Ors. (Uttarakhand High Court) The petitioner challenged an adjudication order dated 01.12.2025 passed under Section 73(9) of the Uttarakhand GST Act/CGST Act read with Rule 122, whereby a demand for differential tax at 10% was raised on spare parts manufactured during FY 2021–22. The proceedings originated from an audit conducted under Section 65 of the CGST Act, followed by a show cause notice dated 26.09.2025. The petitioner submitted a reply and was granted a personal hearing before the adjudication order was is...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930