Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Prashant Rajnikant Mehta Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Prashant Rajnikant Mehta Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai) Demand under Section 11A not sustainable against non-chargeable persons; penalty under Rule 209A not leviable absent confiscation The appellants are individuals. Barnala International is an exporter. Ranjeet Choudhary was the proprietor. It exported goods under claim for drawback. It was held that drawback was allegedly fraudulently claimed as goods were not exported. Accordingly; a demand of drawback over Rs. 20 crores along with interest and penalty was confirmed against the appellants on the ground that they were the...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031