Case Law Details
Case Name : Prashant Rajnikant Mehta Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Prashant Rajnikant Mehta Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
Demand under Section 11A not sustainable against non-chargeable persons; penalty under Rule 209A not leviable absent confiscation
The appellants are individuals. Barnala International is an exporter. Ranjeet Choudhary was the proprietor. It exported goods under claim for drawback. It was held that drawback was allegedly fraudulently claimed as goods were not exported. Accordingly; a demand of drawback over Rs. 20 crores along with interest and penalty was confirmed against the appellants on the ground that they were the...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

