Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kanakapura Venkataramanaswamy Madhusudhan Karthik Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kanakapura Venkataramanaswamy Madhusudhan Karthik Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) ITAT Bangalore remands addition U/s 69A on alleged bogus agricultural income; directs fresh verification of evidence In this case, the Bangalore ITAT dealt with disallowance of agricultural income of ₹29.86 lakh, which was treated by the AO as unexplained money u/s 69A. The assessee had claimed such income as exempt u/s 10(1) from cultivation of coconut and guava on 5.75 acres of land (owned by father).  AO rejected the claim based on multiple factors : Land was not in assessee’s name, and no formal right to cultiv...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031