Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

ITAT Bangalore remands addition U/s 69A on alleged bogus agricultural income; directs fresh verification of evidence

Case Law Details

Case Name
Kanakapura Venkataramanaswamy Madhusudhan Karthik Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2020-21
Advertisement Kanakapura Venkataramanaswamy Madhusudhan Karthik Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) ITAT Bangalore remands addition U/s 69A on alleged bogus agricultural income; directs fresh verification of evidence In this case, the Bangalore ITAT dealt with disallowance of agricultural income of ₹29.86 lakh, which was treated by the AO as unexplained money u/s 69A. The assessee had claimed such income as exempt u/s 10(1) from cultivation of coconut and guava on 5.75 acres of land (owned by father).  AO rejected the claim based on multiple factors : Land was not in assessee’s name, and no forma...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,920

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *