Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : MRF Limited Vs Commissioner of GST and Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
MRF Limited Vs Commissioner of GST and Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai) CESTAT Chennai held that tyres, tubes and flaps secured by plastic carry straps are not “placed in a package” within the meaning of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009. Hence, provisions of section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 inapplicable. Facts- The present appeal is directed against Order-in- Original dated 31.05.2023 whereby the learned Commissioner has disallowed valuation adopted under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 in respect of certain tyres, tubes and flaps cleared to the replacement market and has ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930