Case Law Details
Case Name : Suhas Ramesh Rao Rangadhol Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Bangalore
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Suhas Ramesh Rao Rangadhol Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Assessee challenged addition of ₹33.20 lakh u/s 68 r.w.s 115BBE towards demonetisation cash deposits & GP addition of ₹94,903. AO treated SBN deposits as unexplained despite assessee showing cash balances across three proprietary concerns & offering sales in books.
ITAT held that assessee had sufficient cash on hand as on 09-11-2016 reflected in regular books & not disproved by AO. Mere deposit of existing cash during demonetisation cannot be treated as unexplained unless books are rejected or cash balance shown as fictitious. ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


