This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
ITAT Bangalore : CIT(A) Has No Power to Set Aside & Remand Assessment (Non-144 Cases) – Matter Restored to CIT(A) for Decision on Merits
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Alex Puthenchira Johnson Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2013-14
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Bangalore
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Alex Puthenchira Johnson Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Assessee challenged NFAC order where CIT(A) set aside reassessment orders & restored matters to AO for de-novo adjudication relating to additions u/s 2(22)(e) (deemed dividend). Assessment orders were passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s 147 & not u/s 144.
ITAT held that powers of CIT(A) u/s 251 to set aside assessment & remand to AO are restricted. Such power exists only where assessment is framed u/s 144 (as per amended provisions). Since impugned assessments were not u/s 144, CIT(A) exceeded jurisdiction by remanding matter. CIT(A) is duty-bo...




