Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Suhas Ramesh Rao Rangadhol Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Suhas Ramesh Rao Rangadhol Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Assessee challenged addition of ₹33.20 lakh u/s 68 r.w.s 115BBE towards demonetisation cash deposits & GP addition of ₹94,903. AO treated SBN deposits as unexplained despite assessee showing cash balances across three proprietary concerns & offering sales in books. ITAT held that assessee had sufficient cash on hand as on 09-11-2016 reflected in regular books & not disproved by AO. Mere deposit of existing cash during demonetisation cannot be treated as unexplained unless books are rejected or cash balance shown as fictitious. ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Mens Rea, No Misconduct: ICAI Clears CA in Alleged Bribery Trap Case CA Not Liable for Client’s Bogus Entries: ICAI Clears Accountant with No Certification Role Suspicion ≠ Proof: ICAI Clears CA in Alleged Multi-Bank Loan Fraud Case Delayed Retraction Backfires: ICAI Finds CA Guilty in Bogus Donation Tax Evasion Scheme Admission Seals Fate: ICAI Reprimands CA in Bogus Political Donation Scam View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930