Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jayantilal Jesaram Purohit Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Jayantilal Jesaram Purohit Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) 153C Additions Based Only on Third-Party Pen-Drive and Statements Deleted for Want of Corroboration and Cross-Examination In search-related assessments for AYs 2017-18 to 2019-20, additions under section 69 were made in the assessee’s hands based solely on an Excel file found in a pen drive seized from an employee of the Rubberwala group and statements of third-party persons alleging receipt of cash “on-money” for shop purchases. The assessee consistently denied paying any cash over and above the registered agreement value and pointed out ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Bangalore ITAT Upholds Section 11 Exemption Despite Alleged Capitation Fee Collections Bangalore ITAT Allows Mine Development Expenditure as Revenue Expense; Deletes Double Addition ITAT Allows Exemption for BSNL VRS Compensation and Leave Encashment ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition; Cash Redeposit from Earlier Property Sale Accepted Entire Sales Receipts Cannot Be Taxed Under Section 69A: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930