Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Airoplast Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Airoplast Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Section 69 Cannot Be Invoked for Recorded Share Investments Merely Due to Premium Mismatch: ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹2.45 Cr Addition The Mumbai ITAT (“A” Bench) allowed the appeal of Airoplast Pvt. Ltd. for AY 2015-16 and deleted the addition of ₹2.45 crore made under section 69, holding that the foundational conditions for invoking the deeming provision were not satisfied. The reassessment was initiated on the premise that the assessee had invested ₹2.45 crore in shares of JKM Holdings Pvt. Ltd. at a lower premium than that allegedly charg...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Complianc U/s 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031