Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Airoplast Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Airoplast Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Section 69 Cannot Be Invoked for Recorded Share Investments Merely Due to Premium Mismatch: ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹2.45 Cr Addition The Mumbai ITAT (“A” Bench) allowed the appeal of Airoplast Pvt. Ltd. for AY 2015-16 and deleted the addition of ₹2.45 crore made under section 69, holding that the foundational conditions for invoking the deeming provision were not satisfied. The reassessment was initiated on the premise that the assessee had invested ₹2.45 crore in shares of JKM Holdings Pvt. Ltd. at a lower premium than that allegedly charg...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Quashes U/s 153C Assessments: AO Cannot Simply Copy Satisfaction Note Reopening Quashed: AO Added Share Capital, Loan & Premium Without Understanding Transaction Nature WhatsApp Chats, Screenshots & Suspicion Can’t Prove On-Money: ITAT Jaipur ITAT Directs TDS Refund Despite Delayed E-Verification; Revenue Cannot Retain Tax on Technical Grounds ITAT Quashes Reassessment: Approval from PCIT Instead of PCCIT Renders Section 148 Notice Invalid View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930